Petitioner
Spouses Pacifico
Respondent
Lucio Maco
Citation
G.R. No. 226752
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
September 29, 2021

Summary

This case involves a dispute over possession of registered land between the registered owner's heirs and occupants claiming ownership by prescription. Lucio Maco owned land under a 1977 Torrens title but discovered in 1980 that spouses Resano were claiming ownership and had their tenant cultivating the property. After failed settlement attempts, Maco filed an action for recovery of possession in 2000. The Resanos claimed acquisitive prescription and challenged the title's validity, arguing they had possessed the land since 1942. All three court levels ruled in favor of Maco's heirs, applying the fundamental principle that registered land cannot be acquired by prescription or adverse possession. The Supreme Court emphasized that Torrens titles are indefeasible and cannot be collaterally attacked in possession suits, and that registered owners have an imprescriptible right to recover possession regardless of how long unauthorized occupation may have lasted.

Statutes applied

By Intellegal Editorial Board · September 29, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.