Petitioner
Sps. Tedy Garcia
Respondent
Loreta T. Santos
Citation
G.R. No. 228334
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Caguioa, J.
Decided
June 17, 2019

Summary

The Supreme Court established that when two properties were formerly owned by one person and one property contains apparent signs of easement (such as windows and openings) that continue to exist after the property is sold to another person, Article 624 of the Civil Code creates an easement of light and view by title without need for formal prohibition. The Court reversed lower courts that had dismissed the complaint, finding that Sps. Garcia acquired such easement when they purchased their property from Sps. Santos in 1998, since the windows and openings in their house constituted apparent signs of easement that continued after the sale. The Court ordered respondents to remove portions of their building to comply with the three-meter distance rule under Article 673 of the Civil Code, as their structure was built only two meters from the boundary line.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · June 17, 2019

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.