Petitioner
Mondragon International Philippines
Respondent
Union Bank of the Philippines
Citation
G.R. No. 228530
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
January 21, 2019

Summary

The Supreme Court denied petitioners' appeal but modified the Court of Appeals decision in two key aspects. First, it restored the principal obligation amount to P116,000,000.00 as determined by the RTC, noting that Union Bank waived its right to challenge this amount by not appealing. Second, applying Article 1229 of the Civil Code, the Court reduced the unconscionable penalty charge from 2% monthly (24% per annum) to 1% monthly (12% per annum) starting from the 1999 default date. The case establishes that appellees cannot obtain relief beyond what was granted in lower court decisions without filing their own appeal, and that courts have discretion to reduce iniquitous penalty clauses in contracts. This decision balances contractual obligations with principles of equity and fairness in commercial lending relationships.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · January 21, 2019

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.