Petitioner
Philippine Savings Bank
Respondent
Co
Citation
G.R. No. 232004
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Leonen, J.
Decided
October 6, 2021

Summary

This Supreme Court case established that banks must provide personal notice to mortgagors before extrajudicial foreclosure, despite Act No. 3135's silence on this requirement. Josephine Co borrowed P10 million from Philippine Savings Bank, secured by real estate mortgage. When Co defaulted, the bank foreclosed without personal notice, relying on the promissory note's waiver clause. The Regional Trial Court initially dismissed Co's challenge, but the Court of Appeals reversed, finding that a contractual provision requiring correspondence to be sent to Co's address created an obligation for personal notice. The Supreme Court affirmed, significantly reconsidering the Bonnevie doctrine and holding that due process principles and banking industry standards require personal notification. The Court emphasized that banking is imbued with public interest, requiring banks to exercise utmost diligence. This decision strengthens mortgagor protection by mandating personal notice regardless of contractual waivers, marking an important shift in extrajudicial foreclosure jurisprudence toward greater procedural safeguards for borrowers.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 6, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.