Petitioner
Alberto C. Hidalgo
Respondent
Conrado Bascuguin
Citation
G.R. No. 233217
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Leonen, J.
Decided
October 6, 2021

Summary

Alberto Hidalgo challenged the validity of a pacto de retro sale executed by his wife Evelyn of their conjugal property to Conrado Bascuguin for P300,000 without his consent. Alberto proved his signature was forged as he was in Dubai when the December 2002 sale occurred, arriving in the Philippines only on December 23, 2002. The Supreme Court affirmed that under Article 124 of the Family Code, disposition of conjugal property without written spousal consent is void. However, applying Article 1398 of the Civil Code, the Court ordered mutual restitution: Bascuguin must return the property title while the Hidalgo spouses must reimburse the purchase price with legal interest. The Court noted Alberto was bound by his judicial admission offering such reimbursement and denied his claims for damages due to insufficient evidence.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · October 6, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.