Petitioner
Costelo
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 236934
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
June 11, 2018

Summary

The Supreme Court denied petitioner Norberto Costelo's appeal from his conviction for the complex crime of estafa through falsification of public and private documents. As Claims Manager of PSIC, Costelo fraudulently obtained P100,000 by falsifying documents for a non-existent CTPL claim supposedly filed by Edna Delos Santos. The Court found all elements of both estafa and falsification proven beyond reasonable doubt, noting that falsification was a necessary means to commit the fraud. The conviction was affirmed but the penalty was modified pursuant to Republic Act No. 10951, which amended the penalties under Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code. The Court imposed an indeterminate sentence considering falsification as the more serious offense.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 11, 2018

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.