Petitioner
Ma. Julieta B. Bendecio
Respondent
Virginia B. Bautista
Citation
G.R. No. 242087
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
J.Y. Lopez, J.
Decided
December 7, 2021

Summary

This case involves a collection suit for an unpaid loan of P1,100,000.00 with 8% monthly interest. Respondent Bautista lent money to petitioner Bendecio in February 2013. When payment became due in May 2013, Bendecio's business partner Mascariñas executed a promissory note extending payment to August 2013, but payment was still not made. Petitioners claimed novation occurred when Mascariñas assumed the debt and that payment was already made. The Supreme Court ruled that no valid novation occurred as the creditor's express consent was not proven, and mere acceptance of a promissory note does not constitute novation. No proof of payment was established. Both petitioners were held solidarily liable as business partners under Civil Code provisions on partnership liability to third persons. The Court modified the interest rates per prevailing jurisprudence, removed moral damages for lack of bad faith, but affirmed the attorney's fees award. The case establishes important precedents on loan novation requirements and partnership solidarity liability.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · December 7, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.