Petitioner
Jollibee Foods Corporation
Respondent
L.O.L. Food Ventures Corporation
Citation
G.R. No. 246131
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Decided
June 15, 2020

Summary

Jollibee Foods Corporation sought to avoid reimbursing L.O.L. Food Ventures Corporation for rental and common area expenses that the latter advanced on behalf of Mall Food Ventures and Royal Garden Restaurant upon Jollibee's request. The Court of Appeals held Jollibee solidarily liable for reimbursement, which the Supreme Court affirmed. The Court ruled that despite sublease arrangements, Jollibee remained principally obligated under the original lease contract. Under Article 1236 of the Civil Code, respondent who paid others' obligations with petitioner's knowledge and consent could validly seek reimbursement. The Court also found petitioner estopped from denying reimbursement based on its representations, emphasizing that allowing such denial would constitute unjust enrichment. This case reinforces principles of contractual solidarity, third-party payment rights, and estoppel in lease relationships.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · June 15, 2020

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.