- Petitioner
- People
- Respondent
- Xxx
- Citation
- G.R. No. 249661
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- First Division
- Decided
- July 6, 2022
Summary
This Supreme Court decision involved the criminal appeal of XXX and YYY who were convicted of rape by sexual intercourse. The case arose from incidents on April 3, 2012, where the heavily intoxicated victim AAA was allegedly raped by the accused at YYY's house. The RTC convicted both accused, which was affirmed by the CA with modified damages. The Supreme Court upheld the convictions, finding that the victim's testimony was credible and that force was sufficiently established despite her intoxicated state. The Court emphasized that effective resistance is not required in rape cases and that the force must be viewed from the victim's perception. The decision affirmed the penalty of reclusion perpetua and damages of P75,000.00 each for civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages. The case demonstrates the Court's approach to evaluating rape cases involving intoxicated victims and the standards for proving force in such circumstances.