Petitioner
Alterado
Respondent
Rustan Commercial
Citation
G.R. No. 249864
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
July 6, 2022

Summary

July Alterado was convicted of qualified theft for allegedly stealing P36M worth of jewelry from employer Rustan Commercial Corporation and ordered to pay civil liability. The Court of Appeals acquitted her, finding insufficient evidence of unlawful taking. When RCC sought execution of the civil liability portion, the trial court denied it, but the CA ordered execution, ruling acquittal on reasonable doubt doesn't extinguish civil liability. The Supreme Court reversed, finding the acquittal was actually based on lack of proof of theft, not reasonable doubt. Since no unlawful taking was established, no civil liability could exist. The Court emphasized that imposing such massive liability without proven wrongdoing would be fundamentally unjust, reinstating the trial court's denial of execution.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 6, 2022

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.