Petitioner
Tuazon
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 253335
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Decided
June 15, 2022

Summary

This criminal case involved the illegal possession of 0.029 gram of shabu by Edilberto Tuazon. He was arrested on January 20, 2011, for breach of peace, and during the search, police found the prohibited substance. The RTC and CA both found him guilty, but the Supreme Court acquitted him due to the prosecution's failure to comply with the strict procedural requirements of Section 21 of R.A. No. 9165. The Court emphasized that the three-witness rule (media, DOJ, and elected official representatives) during inventory and photographing is mandatory to prevent evidence planting and ensure chain of custody integrity. The case reinforces the importance of strict compliance with anti-drug law procedures to protect accused persons' rights while maintaining evidence credibility.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 15, 2022

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.