- Petitioner
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Respondent
- Court of Tax Appeals Second Division
- Citation
- G.R. No. 258947
- Court
- From Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) Second Division to Supreme Court (SC)
- Division
- First Division
- Ponente
- Caguioa, J.
- Decided
- March 29, 2022
Summary
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue challenged CTA Second Division Resolutions that cancelled QLDI's deficiency tax assessment for 2010 due to prescription and enjoined tax collection. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that CIR used the wrong remedy (certiorari instead of appeal to CTA En Banc) since the CTA Resolutions were final judgments. On the merits, the Court affirmed CTA's jurisdiction over prescription issues under the 'other matters' provision but corrected the prescription period from five years to three years. Since the Formal Assessment Notice was issued December 12, 2014, CIR had until December 12, 2017 to collect taxes, making the 2020 collection efforts time-barred. The decision reinforces that prescription protects taxpayers from indefinite tax liability uncertainty while confirming CTA's authority to enjoin prescribed tax collections. This case clarifies the proper prescription periods for tax collection and remedial procedures in tax cases.