Petitioner
People
Respondent
Akmad
Citation
G.R. No. 30449
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
JOHNSON
Decided
July 29, 1929

Summary

Akmad was charged with subornation of perjury for allegedly inducing Moro Palao to give false testimony in a murder case. The prosecution claimed Akmad intimidated Palao into changing his testimony about whether he could see the accused on the night of the murder, causing the government to lose crucial evidence. The Court of First Instance convicted Akmad and imposed imprisonment, fine, and disqualification. However, the Supreme Court reversed the conviction, finding the evidence insufficient. The Court held that the prosecution failed to present the best evidence of the alleged false testimony and did not prove that the testimony was given under oath, both essential elements of subornation of perjury. The information was dismissed and defendant ordered released.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 29, 1929

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.