Petitioner
Alejandro Masongsong
Respondent
Victoria Flores
Citation
G.R. No. 36048
Court
Supreme Court En Banc
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Malcolm, J.
Decided
September 24, 1932

Summary

Property dispute between adjacent landowners Masongsong and Flores regarding Civil Code easement requirements. Flores built a house with windows less than two meters from Masongsong's property, apparently violating Article 582. The key issue was whether Article 584's exception for buildings separated by public thoroughfares applied to their private alley opened to public use. The Supreme Court ruled that private alleys opened to public under Manila ordinances constitute public thoroughfares for Civil Code purposes, exempting them from the two-meter requirement. The decision clarifies that privately-funded alleys dedicated to public use have the same legal status as public alleys, establishing important precedent for urban property development and easement law interpretation.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · September 24, 1932

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.