People v. Ducosin · G.R. 38332

Petitioner: People
Respondent: Ducosin
Citation: G.R. No. 38332
Court: Supreme Court
Division: En Banc
Ponente: Butte, J.
Decided: December 14, 1933

Application and interpretation of the Indeterminate Sentence Law (Act No. 4103) to frustrated murder conviction

Summary

This landmark Supreme Court En Banc decision established the first interpretation and application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law (Act No. 4103) in the Philippines. Ducosin was convicted of frustrated murder for stabbing Rafael Yanguas, with death prevented only by medical intervention. While the original sentence of ten years and one day was legally correct under the Revised Penal Code, the Supreme Court modified it to comply with the new Indeterminate Sentence Law, setting a maximum of ten years and one day and minimum of seven years. The Court established crucial precedents for determining maximum penalties (using existing Penal Code provisions) and minimum penalties (considering individual circumstances for rehabilitation), emphasizing the law's goal to individualize criminal justice while protecting society.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

U.S. v. Pico G.R. No. L-5487
People v. Maclang G.R. No. 214218
People v. Amit G.R. No. L-29066
People v. Onavia G.R. No. L-38348
People v. Benito G.R. No. L-32042
People v. Gonzalez G.R. No. 48293
People v. Emma Sevilla Cruz G.R. No. L-7928
People v. Ignacio G.R. No. L-21735
Felomino v. People G.R. No. 245332
Valerio v. People G.R. No. 248377

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Penalties under the Revised Penal Code

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · December 14, 1933

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.