Petitioner
Macondray & Co.
Respondent
Feliciano Benito
Citation
G.R. No. 43014
Court
Supreme Court En Banc
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Goddard, J.
Decided
September 24, 1935

Summary

Macondray & Co., Inc. sold personal property to defendants Benito and Ocampo on installment plan with chattel mortgage security. When defendants defaulted on payments, plaintiff foreclosed the mortgage and recovered P550 at auction, then sued for the remaining P2,500+ balance. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's dismissal, holding that under Article 1454-A of the Civil Code (Act No. 4122), a vendor who chooses to foreclose a chattel mortgage on installment sale property cannot pursue the purchaser for any unpaid balance. This landmark decision established the anti-deficiency rule for installment sales of personal property, protecting purchasers from double recovery by limiting vendors to either cancellation or foreclosure remedies, but not both. The ruling significantly impacted commercial installment financing practices in the Philippines.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · September 24, 1935

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.