Petitioner
China Air Lines
Respondent
Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 45985
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Regalado, J.
Decided
May 18, 1990

Summary

Jose Pagsibigan sued China Air Lines (CAL), Philippine Air Lines (PAL), and Roberto Espiritu for damages after missing his flight due to incorrect departure time on his ticket. PAL employee Espiritu had written 5:20 PM instead of the correct 10:20 AM departure time. The trial court found only PAL and Espiritu liable, but the Court of Appeals added CAL to the liability. The Supreme Court modified the decision, absolving CAL since no employer-employee relationship existed between CAL and PAL/Espiritu. The Court confirmed PAL and Espiritu's joint and several liability under quasi-delict principles, finding PAL failed to exercise due diligence in employee supervision. The case established important precedents on employer liability, agency relationships in aviation, and the distinction between contractual and tortious liability in transportation cases.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · May 18, 1990

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.