Citation
G.R. No. 47724
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
June 17, 1941

Summary

This case involves the recovery of allegedly usurious interest payments. Hermenegildo Deveza's heirs sued Manuel Ruiz Ruiloba as judicial administrator to recover money allegedly collected as usurious interest. The Supreme Court affirmed dismissal based on res judicata and failure to file compulsory counterclaim. The Court held that since the usurious interest claim related to the same debts that were the subject of a previous civil case No. 6949, plaintiff was required under Article 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure to file a counterclaim in that case. Having failed to do so, he was forever barred from asserting the claim, constituting estoppel by judgment. The decision reinforces the importance of the compulsory counterclaim rule and res judicata principles in civil litigation.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 17, 1941

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.