Petitioner
Florentino Cursino
Respondent
Hon. Pedro Jl. Bautista
Citation
G.R. No. 50335
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Bidin, J.
Decided
August 7, 1989

Summary

This unlawful detainer case involved landlord Maria James seeking to eject tenant Florentino Cursino for non-payment of rent. Cursino defaulted on October-December 1977 rentals but paid them late after receiving a demand letter, then refused to vacate claiming protection under P.D. No. 20. The Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' decisions favoring the landlord, ruling that P.D. No. 20 only suspends ejectment for indefinite period leases, not for non-payment of rent. The Court emphasized that late payment of back rentals does not automatically restore the lease contract without the lessor's consent, and that the landlord's demand to vacate followed by the tenant's refusal makes continued possession unlawful. This case clarifies the scope of P.D. No. 20's rent control protections and reinforces landlords' rights to terminate leases for material breaches.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 7, 1989

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.