Petitioner
Narciso Buenaventura
Respondent
Hon. Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 50837
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Melo, J.
Decided
December 28, 1992

Summary

The Buenaventura siblings claimed entitlement to inherit one-third of a government lot as heirs of Julian Caiña, but alleged the lot was fraudulently sold only to other heirs (Lorenzo and Francisca) in 1965 and subsequently transferred to Manotok Realty in 1966. They filed suit in 1976 seeking reconveyance based on fraud and simulation. The Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of their complaint, ruling that their action for reconveyance based on fraud was time-barred under the 10-year prescription period for actions based on constructive trust, and additionally barred by laches. The Court emphasized that prescription rules are designed to protect innocent purchasers for value against parties who unreasonably delay asserting their rights, noting that allowing such belated claims would be anathema to good order in property transactions.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · December 28, 1992

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.