Petitioner
Philippine Virginia Tobacco Administration
Respondent
Hon. Ricardo P. Tensuan
Citation
G.R. No. 58817
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Paras, J.
Decided
August 20, 1990

Summary

This Supreme Court case resolved a dispute over the proper interest rate applicable to a judgment debt arising from a tobacco sale contract. When tobacco delivered by farmers' cooperatives was destroyed by fire in 1963 at a redrying facility, the tobacco administration was ordered to pay damages plus interest. The key legal issue was whether Central Bank Circular No. 416 (prescribing 12% interest) or Civil Code Article 2209 (prescribing 6% interest) should apply. The Supreme Court held that the Central Bank Circular applies only to loans or forbearance of money, not to all monetary judgments arising from commercial transactions. Since the underlying transaction was a contract of sale rather than a loan, the Court applied the 6% interest rate under the Civil Code, modifying the lower court's order that had applied the 12% rate.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 20, 1990

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.