Petitioner
Rustan Pulp & Paper Mills
Respondent
The Intermediate Appellate Court
Citation
G.R. No. 70789
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Melo, J.
Decided
October 19, 1992

Summary

This case involved a breach of contract dispute between Rustan Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc. and its pulp wood supplier Romeo A. Lluch. The Supreme Court ruled that a contractual provision allowing unilateral stoppage of deliveries based solely on the buyer's determination of sufficient supply was potestative and therefore void under Article 1306 of the Civil Code. The Court found Rustan liable for breach of contract after it sent a stoppage notice but continued accepting deliveries from other suppliers, contradicting its claim of sufficient supply. However, the Court modified the lower court's decision by absolving individual corporate officers from personal liability, establishing that corporate officers acting in their official capacity cannot be held personally liable absent specific stipulation, reinforcing the doctrine of separate corporate personality.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 19, 1992

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.