Petitioner
Philippine Rabbit Bus Line
Respondent
Hon. Leonardo I. Cruz
Citation
G.R. No. 71017
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Narvasa, J.
Decided
July 28, 1986

Summary

Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines challenged the 12% interest rate applied during execution of a civil damages judgment, arguing that Central Bank Circular No. 416 should not apply to non-loan cases. The Supreme Court agreed, ruling that the Monetary Board's authority under the Usury Law extends only to loans and forbearances, not general civil damages judgments. The Court applied Civil Code Article 2209 requiring 6% interest for monetary obligations, distinguishing this from the 12% rate for loan transactions. The decision clarified the scope of Central Bank authority over interest rates and affirmed that civil damages judgments are governed by Civil Code provisions, not banking regulations. Philippine Rabbit was entitled to refund of excess interest totaling P41,325.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 28, 1986

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.