Petitioner
Philippine Commercial International Bank (Formerly Philippine Commercial & Industrial Bank)
Respondent
Intermediate Appellate Court
Citation
G.R. No. 73610
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Medialdea, J.
Decided
April 19, 1991

Summary

PCIB filed simultaneous collection suit and foreclosure proceedings against Spouses Salgado for a P1.3 million promissory note secured by real estate mortgages. The bank obtained a writ of attachment by falsely representing the note as unsecured, deliberately deleting 'REM' notation from documents. The Supreme Court held this violated the rule against splitting a single cause of action and constituted bad faith in obtaining the attachment. The Court applied Article 1252 of the Civil Code, allowing foreclosure proceeds to be applied to the most onerous debt first. While affirming the bank's liability for wrongful attachment, the Court significantly reduced the excessive damages awarded by the appellate court to reasonable amounts reflecting the actual harm suffered.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · April 19, 1991

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.