Petitioner
Traders Royal Bank
Respondent
The Honorable Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 78412
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Griño-Aquino, J.
Decided
September 26, 1989

Summary

Traders Royal Bank sued Philippine Blooming Mills (PBM) and its surety Alfredo Ching to collect P22.2 million. When SEC placed PBM under rehabilitation receivership, the Court of Appeals ruled that this suspended all related claims including those against individual sureties. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that SEC jurisdiction under P.D. 902-A and P.D. 1758 extends only to corporations, not individual sureties. The Court emphasized the separate legal personality of corporations from their officers/stockholders and applied Civil Code Article 1216 allowing creditors to pursue solidary debtors separately. This established that corporate rehabilitation receivership does not shield individual guarantors from separate collection suits, preventing sureties from escaping liability by co-filing corporate suspension petitions.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · September 26, 1989

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.