Petitioner
Felisa P. de Roy
Respondent
Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 80718
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Cortes, J.
Decided
January 29, 1988

Summary

This case involves a building collapse tort liability dispute and procedural law issues regarding appeal deadlines. Petitioners' building firewall collapsed, destroying private respondents' tailoring shop, causing injuries and death. The Regional Trial Court found petitioners liable for gross negligence under Article 2190 of the Civil Code, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. When petitioners sought to challenge this through certiorari, the Supreme Court denied their petition, emphasizing that the Court of Appeals correctly applied the Habaluyas rule prohibiting extensions of time to file motions for reconsideration. The case demonstrates the strict application of procedural rules in appellate practice and upholds the Civil Code provision on building owner liability for structural collapses due to lack of necessary repairs.

Statutes applied

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 29, 1988

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.