- Petitioner
- Visayan Sawmill Company
- Respondent
- The Honorable Court of Appeals
- Citation
- G.R. No. 83851
- Court
- Supreme Court En Banc
- Division
- En Banc
- Ponente
- Davide, Jr., J.
- Decided
- March 3, 1993
Summary
This case involved a dispute over a scrap iron sale contract where the Supreme Court reversed lower court decisions by distinguishing between a contract of sale and a contract to sell. Visayan Sawmill Company agreed to sell scrap iron to RJH Trading conditioned on the buyer opening an irrevocable letter of credit by May 15, 1983. When the buyer failed to comply with this suspensive condition (opening a different type of letter of credit through a third party corporation), the seller validly cancelled the contract. The Supreme Court held that no delivery occurred despite the buyer's men being allowed to dig scrap iron on the seller's premises, as this was mere accommodation pending fulfillment of the condition. The Court applied Article 1597 of the Civil Code allowing rescission when the buyer breaches before delivery, and criticized the excessive damages awarded by lower courts as having no legal basis since the seller acted within contractual rights. The decision clarifies important distinctions in contract law regarding conditional sales and delivery requirements.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
Reversed the lower courts and dismissed the case, holding that the agreement was a contract to sell subject to the suspensive condition of the buyer opening an irrevocable letter of credit, that the condition's non-fulfillment meant the obligation to sell never arose, and that permission to dig the scrap iron was mere accommodation and not delivery; rescission was proper under Article 1597.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.