Petitioner
Ouano Arrastre Service
Respondent
The Hon. Peary G. Aleonar
Citation
G.R. No. 97664
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Feliciano, J.
Decided
October 10, 1991

Summary

IPI sued Mercantile Insurance and OASI for replacement of damaged imported equipment, obtaining a joint and several liability judgment for P435,000. When only Mercantile appealed timely, IPI moved for execution against OASI. OASI's late appeal was based on alleged miscommunication between its law firm's branch offices and claimed benefit from Mercantile's timely appeal as solidary co-debtor. The Supreme Court denied OASI's petition, holding that service of the trial court's decision was valid despite the law firm's internal miscommunication, making OASI's appeal untimely. The Court rejected OASI's argument that it should benefit from Mercantile's appeal under Article 1222 of the Civil Code, finding their defenses conflicted and that OASI waived such rights by failing to appeal. The decision became final and executory against OASI, allowing immediate execution regardless of Mercantile's pending appeal.

Statutes applied

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 10, 1991

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.