Petitioner
Petrona Javier
Respondent
Lazaro Osmeña
Citation
G.R. No. 9984
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Arellano, C.J.
Decided
March 23, 1916

Summary

This landmark case established that fruits and revenues from a wife's paraphernal (separate) property are liable for her husband's business debts contracted during marriage. Petrona Javier's inherited Manila properties were sold to satisfy her husband's P26,467.94 debt to the Osmeña estate from his commission merchant business. While the trial court annulled the sale, the Supreme Court reversed, applying Civil Code provisions on conjugal partnership property. The Court distinguished between the husband's personal debts and debts arising from his profession that contributed to family support, holding that business debts fall under conjugal partnership liabilities. The decision clarified that paraphernal property fruits become conjugal assets subject to creditor claims, balancing spousal property rights with creditor protection in Philippine marital property law.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · March 23, 1916

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.