Petitioner
People
Respondent
Miguel Lasala
Citation
G.R. No. L-12141
Court
Supreme Court
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Bautista Angelo, J.
Decided
January 30, 1962

Whether the acts constitute a complex crime of serious slander by deed with less serious physical injuries, or a single offense of less serious…

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's order requiring the prosecution to amend the information from a complex crime of serious slander by deed with less serious physical injuries to a single offense under Article 265, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code. The Court held that when an act inflicts less serious physical injuries with manifest intent to insult or under circumstances adding ignominy, it should be prosecuted under the specific provision of Article 265, paragraph 2, rather than as a complex crime under Article 48. The case establishes that specific provisions in the Penal Code take precedence over the general complex crime rule when the acts fall squarely within the specific provision's coverage. The assault on a municipal mayor in a public cockpit clearly demonstrated the manifest intent to insult and add ignominy to the offense.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · January 30, 1962

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.