Petitioner
Ganancial
Respondent
Atillo
Citation
G.R. No. L-20830
Court
Supreme Court
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Paredes, J.
Decided
June 28, 1965

Summary

This case establishes the rule for computing the one-year limitation period in forcible entry cases. When dispossession occurs through force, violence or intimidation, the statutory period runs from the date of illegal entry, not from demand to vacate, because the dispossessed party has immediate knowledge of the unlawful deprivation. The Supreme Court distinguished this from cases involving stealth or strategy where the entry may be concealed. Since plaintiff filed the complaint on April 24, 1961, more than one year after the February 6, 1960 forcible entry, both the municipal court and CFI lacked jurisdiction. The case reinforces procedural requirements in ejectment suits and the importance of timely filing within statutory limitations.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 28, 1965

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.