Petitioner
Consolacion P. Mangila
Respondent
Judge Lantin
Citation
G.R. No. L-24735
Court
Supreme Court
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Sanchez, J.
Decided
October 31, 1969

Jurisdiction over serious slander case and whether criminal action requires express complaint from offended parties

Summary

Supreme Court case involving jurisdictional challenge to serious slander prosecution. Petitioner Mangila challenged Court of First Instance jurisdiction, claiming case belonged to Municipal Court and required express complaint from offended parties. Court ruled that both CFI and Municipal Court have concurrent jurisdiction over crimes punishable by more than 6 months but not exceeding 3 years imprisonment. Since serious slander carries penalty of arresto mayor maximum to prision correccional minimum, CFI had proper jurisdiction. Court also held Article 360 RPC requiring express complaint did not apply since imputed acts (prostitution, premarital relations) either involve crimes prosecutable de officio or are not crimes requiring private complaint. Petition dismissed, allowing criminal prosecution to proceed.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 31, 1969

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.