Petitioner
People
Respondent
Bernardo Reyes
Citation
G.R. No. L-7712
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Paras, C.J.
Decided
March 23, 1956

Whether an information for coercion under Article 287 of the Revised Penal Code is sufficient without alleging violence as an element

Summary

This criminal case involved defendants who allegedly seized a passenger jeep belonging to another person through deceit and misrepresentation to answer for a debt. The Municipal Court and Court of First Instance dismissed the case because the information did not allege violence, which they believed was required for coercion under Article 287. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the second paragraph of Article 287 covers 'other coercions or unjust vexations' that do not require violence as an element. The Court distinguished this from the first paragraph which specifically requires violence for taking a debtor's property. The case established that coercion can be committed through deceit and misrepresentation, not just violence, and that dismissal on insufficient information grounds does not bar re-prosecution.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · March 23, 1956

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.