Statute
Labor Code
Article
Art. 297
Topic
Termination by employer for just causes
Status
In force, as amended
Formerly
Art. 282
Year
1974
Cited by
A Supreme Court decision

The provision

ARTICLE 282. Termination by employer. An employer may terminate an employment for any of the following causes: Serious misconduct or willful disobedience by the employee of the lawful orders of his employer or representative in connection with his work; Gross and habitual neglect by the employee of his duties; Fraud or willful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his employer or duly authorized representative; Commission of a crime or offense by the employee against the person of his employer or any immediate member of his family or his duly authorized representatives; and Other causes analogous to the foregoing.

Intellegal Wiki · In plain terms

Lists the just causes for which an employer may lawfully dismiss an employee: serious misconduct or willful disobedience of lawful work orders, gross and habitual neglect of duties, fraud or willful breach of the employer's trust, commission of a crime against the employer or their family or representatives, and other analogous causes.

An editorially maintained plain-language explanation of this provision — not legal advice.

As renumbered: the Labor Code articles were renumbered in 2015 (DOLE Department Advisory No. 01, s. 2015); this provision's substance is unchanged, though its number may differ from older citations.

Key points

Article 282 (renumbered Article 297) lists the just causes for which an employer may terminate employment: serious misconduct or wilful disobedience of lawful orders connected with work; gross and habitual neglect of duties; fraud or wilful breach of the trust reposed in the employee; commission of a crime or offense against the employer, the employer's family, or a duly authorized representative; and other analogous causes.

Just-cause dismissals turn on the employee's own fault and require observance of procedural due process (the two-notice rule). The article is read with Article 279 on security of tenure and Article 283 on authorized causes.

Cases applying this article

Related provisions

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research that analyzes this provision.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A that cite this provision.

Search Philippine statutes on Intellegal →

Continue your research on Intellegal

Search Philippine statutes on Intellegal →

Reviewed by the Intellegal Legal Team for currency against amending laws and Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.