- Statute
- Revised Penal Code
- Article
- Art. 349
- Topic
- Bigamy
- Year
- 1930
The provision
ARTICLE 349. Bigamy. — The penalty of prisión mayor shall be imposed upon any person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the former marriage has been legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared presumptively dead by means of a judgment rendered in the proper proceedings.
Key points
Article 349 penalizes bigamy with prisión mayor. It is committed by a person who contracts a second or subsequent marriage before the first marriage has been legally dissolved, or before an absent spouse has been judicially declared presumptively dead in the proper proceedings.
The elements are a first valid (or at least subsisting) marriage, the absence of legal dissolution, a second marriage, and its valid celebration in form. A recurring issue is whether a judicial declaration of nullity of the first marriage must precede the second; the provision is read with Family Code Article 36 and with the rules on prejudicial questions in the Rules of Court.
A recurring question under the article is whether a person whose first marriage is later declared void may still be convicted for contracting a second marriage before obtaining that judicial declaration. The provision's reference to a marriage that has not been 'legally dissolved' is why a judicial declaration of nullity is generally required before remarriage, and why a pending civil case on the first marriage's validity may raise a prejudicial question under Rule 111. It is read with Family Code Article 36 and Article 40.
Cases applying this article
- Tenebro v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 150758 (2004)
- Mercado v. Tan G.R. No. 137110 (2000)