Petitioner
Epifanio L. Casolita, Sr.
Respondent
The Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 115703
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Francisco, J.
Decided
July 8, 1997

Summary

ATROP, INC. sued petitioners for recovery of possession of land in Intramuros, Manila, claiming ownership under TCT No. 68927. Petitioners claimed adverse possession since 1953. The Regional Trial Court ruled for ATROP, but petitioners' appeal was dismissed for failure to serve notice of appeal to adverse party. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal, emphasizing that service of notice of appeal is a mandatory procedural requirement, not mere technicality, as it ensures the adverse party is informed that the favorable judgment is being challenged. The Court also held that clients are bound by their counsel's mistakes and that proper substitution of counsel under Rule 138 is required. The case reinforces the importance of strict compliance with procedural rules in appeals.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 8, 1997

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.