Petitioner
Active Realty
Respondent
Daroya
Citation
G.R. No. 141205
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
May 9, 2002

Validity of contract cancellation and buyer's rights under the Maceda Law in real estate installment sales

Summary

This case involves real estate installment buyer protection under the Maceda Law. Active Realty attempted to cancel its contract with overseas worker Necita Daroya after she defaulted on payments, despite her having paid more than the contract price over four years. The Supreme Court found the cancellation invalid because petitioner failed to comply with mandatory requirements under RA 6552: sending notarized cancellation notice and paying cash surrender value. Since the lot was resold to another buyer, the Court ordered petitioner to refund the actual lot value of P875,000.00 with interest or provide a substitute lot. The decision reinforces buyer protection against onerous developer practices and emphasizes strict compliance with Maceda Law procedures for valid contract cancellations.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · May 9, 2002

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.