Petitioner
Sps. Rufino Angel
Respondent
Simplicio Aledo
Citation
G.R. No. 145031
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Carpio Morales, J.
Decided
January 22, 2004

Summary

This construction contract dispute arose when spouses Angel contracted with government employee Modales who used his father-in-law Aledo as dummy contractor to circumvent prohibition on government employees from contracting. After completion, Aledo sued for unpaid balance while Angels counterclaimed for construction defects. The trial court initially ruled for Angels, but Court of Appeals and Supreme Court reversed, holding the contracts were illegal and contrary to public policy. Under Article 1412 of the Civil Code, parties were found in pari delicto and left without remedy against each other. The case demonstrates the strict application of the illegal contract doctrine and the principle that courts will not aid parties to unlawful agreements.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 22, 2004

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.