Petitioner
Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation
Respondent
John Bordman Ltd. of Iloilo
Citation
G.R. No. 159831
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Panganiban, J.
Decided
October 14, 2005

Summary

A petroleum company was sued by a long-time customer for short deliveries of fuel oil over a 20-year period. The customer discovered through volumetric tests that drums contained significantly less fuel than the 210 liters per drum being billed. The Supreme Court ruled that the action for specific performance was not barred by prescription because the cause of action arose only when the buyer discovered the short deliveries with certainty in 1974, and the case was filed in 1980 within the 10-year prescriptive period for contract actions. The Court affirmed orders for specific performance of delivering the shortage and payment of attorney's fees, but deleted exemplary damages for lack of showing of bad faith. The case establishes important precedent on when prescription begins to run in cases involving hidden defects or shortages that buyers cannot readily detect.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 14, 2005

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.