- Petitioner
- Filcon Ready Mixed
- Respondent
- Ucpb General Insurance Company
- Citation
- G.R. No. 229877
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- First Division
- Ponente
- Lazaro-Javier, J.
- Decided
- July 15, 2020
Summary
This case involves the prescription of an insurance company's subrogation action following a vehicular accident. UCPB General Insurance sued Filcon Ready Mixed and its driver for damages after indemnifying its insured for vehicle repairs. The lower courts dismissed the case for prescription, but the Court of Appeals reversed, applying the Vector doctrine allowing 10 years for subrogation actions. The Supreme Court affirmed but modified the reasoning, applying the Henson ruling that abandoned Vector prospectively. Since this case was filed before Vector, the 4-year prescription period for quasi-delicts applied. However, UCPB's demand letter interrupted prescription, providing a fresh 4-year period that made the filing timely. The case establishes important guidelines for applying prescription rules to pre-Vector subrogation cases and clarifies the prospective application of the Henson ruling.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
An insurer's subrogation claim prescribes with the underlying cause of action (four years for quasi-delict), following Henson v. UCPB which abandoned the Vector doctrine; for suits filed before Vector became final, Article 1155 interruption still applies.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.