Petitioner
Spouses Flavio P. Bautista
Respondent
Premiere Development Bank
Citation
G.R. No. 201881
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Inting, J.
Decided
July 15, 2024

Summary

The Supreme Court denied with finality Premiere Development Bank's motion for reconsideration regarding prescription of its mortgage foreclosure action. The case originated from spouses Bautista's PHP500,000 agricultural loan default and subsequent invalid extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings. The Court held that the bank's foreclosure action prescribed under Article 1142 of the Civil Code, as the flawed 2002 foreclosure sale did not interrupt the prescriptive period due to non-compliance with Act No. 3135's publication and posting requirements. The bank's election of extrajudicial foreclosure also waived its right to pursue separate collection remedies. This decision reinforces the mandatory nature of foreclosure procedural requirements and the consequences of non-compliance, while protecting mortgagors from indefinite exposure to collection actions through strict application of prescription rules.

Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding

The posting and publication requirements of Act No. 3135 for an extrajudicial foreclosure sale are mandatory and jurisdictional and cannot be waived by the parties; non-compliance renders the sale void ab initio.

An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 15, 2024

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.