- Petitioner
- Spouses Flavio P. Bautista
- Respondent
- Premiere Development Bank
- Citation
- G.R. No. 201881
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- First Division
- Ponente
- Inting, J.
- Decided
- July 15, 2024
Summary
The Supreme Court denied with finality Premiere Development Bank's motion for reconsideration regarding prescription of its mortgage foreclosure action. The case originated from spouses Bautista's PHP500,000 agricultural loan default and subsequent invalid extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings. The Court held that the bank's foreclosure action prescribed under Article 1142 of the Civil Code, as the flawed 2002 foreclosure sale did not interrupt the prescriptive period due to non-compliance with Act No. 3135's publication and posting requirements. The bank's election of extrajudicial foreclosure also waived its right to pursue separate collection remedies. This decision reinforces the mandatory nature of foreclosure procedural requirements and the consequences of non-compliance, while protecting mortgagors from indefinite exposure to collection actions through strict application of prescription rules.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
The posting and publication requirements of Act No. 3135 for an extrajudicial foreclosure sale are mandatory and jurisdictional and cannot be waived by the parties; non-compliance renders the sale void ab initio.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.