Petitioner
Estrellita Juliano-Llave
Respondent
Republic of the Philippines
Citation
G.R. No. 169766
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Del Castillo, J.
Decided
March 30, 2011

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' declaration that Estrellita Juliano-Llave's 1993 marriage to Sen. Mamintal A.J. Tamano was void ab initio for being bigamous. Sen. Tamano's 1958 marriage to Zorayda Tamano under the Civil Code remained valid and subsisting when he married Estrellita. The Court ruled that the Civil Code, not the Muslim Personal Laws Code (PD 1083), governed the first marriage since it was celebrated before PD 1083's 1977 effectivity. The Court rejected Estrellita's procedural defenses, finding she was not denied due process despite not filing an answer, as her dilatory tactics caused the delays. Zorayda and her son had standing to challenge the bigamous marriage as injured parties. The decision reinforced that bigamous marriages are void ab initio and that subsequent laws cannot retroactively impair vested marital rights under pre-existing legal frameworks.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · March 30, 2011

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.