Statute
Civil Code
Article
Art. 35
Topic
Civil action where no independent civil action is provided
Year
1949

The provision

ARTICLE 35. When a person, claiming to be injured by a criminal offense, charges another with the same, for which no independent civil action is granted in this Code or any special law, but the justice of the peace finds no reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed, or the prosecuting attorney refuses or fails to institute criminal proceedings, the complaint may bring a civil action for damages against the alleged offender. Such civil action may be supported by a preponderance of evidence. Upon the defendant's motion, the court may require the plaintiff to file a bond to indemnify the defendant in case the complaint should be found to be malicious. If during the pendency of the civil action, an information should be presented by the prosecuting attorney, the civil action shall be suspended until the termination of the criminal proceedings.

Key points

Article 35 covers the situation where a person claims injury from a criminal offense but no independent civil action is granted by the Code or a special law, and either the investigating officer finds no reasonable ground to believe a crime was committed or the prosecutor declines to file charges.

In that case the claimant may bring a civil action for damages against the alleged offender, provable by a preponderance of evidence, and the court may require a bond on the defendant's motion. The article completes the set of independent-civil-action provisions with Articles 29, 30, and 34.

Related provisions

Continue your research on Intellegal

Search Philippine statutes on Intellegal →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.