Petitioner
Jason Ivler y Aguilar
Respondent
Hon. Maria Rowena Modesto-San Pedro
Citation
G.R. No. 172716
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Carpio, J.
Decided
November 17, 2010

Whether petitioner's constitutional right against double jeopardy bars prosecution for reckless imprudence resulting in homicide and damage to…

Summary

This Supreme Court case established that reckless imprudence under Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code constitutes a single quasi-offense, regardless of multiple consequences. Jason Ivler, after being convicted of reckless imprudence resulting in slight physical injuries from a vehicular accident, successfully invoked double jeopardy to bar prosecution for reckless imprudence resulting in homicide and property damage arising from the same incident. The Court clarified that Article 48 (complex crimes) does not apply to quasi-offenses under Article 365, and that prosecution should proceed from a single charge regardless of the number or severity of consequences. The decision strengthened constitutional protection against double jeopardy in quasi-offense cases and resolved doctrinal confusion about the relationship between Articles 48 and 365 of the Revised Penal Code.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · November 17, 2010

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.