Petitioner
United Muslim
Respondent
Buen
Citation
G.R. No. 179653
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Nachura, J.
Decided
July 31, 2009

Summary

UMCUPAI, a squatter organization, sought to annul SFC's sale of Lot 300-C to BRYC, claiming their 1991 Letter of Intent created binding obligation for exclusive purchase rights. The Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' dismissal, ruling the Letter of Intent was merely a manifestation of intention to facilitate UMCUPAI's loan application, not a binding contract. The Court distinguished between conditional contracts of sale and bilateral contracts to sell under the Civil Code, emphasizing that intentions alone cannot create legal obligations. The Letter of Intent contained no promise or commitment for exclusive sale, only declarations of intention subject to UMCUPAI's ability to raise funds. After nearly four years and successfully purchasing a larger portion (Lot 300-A), UMCUPAI's failure to acquire Lot 300-C before SFC's sale to BRYC was not attributable to any breach by SFC.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · July 31, 2009

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.