Petitioner
People
Respondent
Pitoc
Citation
G.R. No. 18513
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
September 18, 1922

Whether defendant's conduct of living with a woman other than his wife constituted 'cohabitation' under the amended concubinage law

Summary

This criminal case involved Pedro Pitoc, who was prosecuted for concubinage after leaving his newly wedded wife to resume cohabitation with his former mistress. The Supreme Court affirmed his conviction, interpreting the amended Penal Code provision that expanded concubinage to include any cohabitation with a woman other than one's wife. The Court's decision clarified that 'cohabit' means living together as husband and wife, regardless of legal marriage status. The case established that the crime of concubinage exists independently of any divorce proceedings, and that the defendant's conduct of admittedly living with another woman while married constituted criminal cohabitation under the law.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · September 18, 1922

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.