Petitioner
Makati Tuscany Condominium Corporation
Respondent
Multi-Realty Development Corporation
Citation
G.R. No. 185530
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Leonen, J.
Decided
April 18, 2018

Summary

This case involved a dispute over ownership of 98 parking slots in Makati Tuscany condominium. Multi-Realty developed the project and executed a Master Deed that included these slots as common areas transferred to MATUSCO. However, Multi-Realty continued selling the slots and MATUSCO cooperated by issuing management certificates and even offering to buy remaining slots. When slot values increased dramatically in 1989, MATUSCO claimed ownership. The Supreme Court granted reformation of the instruments, finding that the parties' subsequent conduct proved their true intention was for Multi-Realty to retain ownership. The Court emphasized that reformation is allowed when written instruments fail to reflect true party intentions due to mistake, and that subsequent acts can prove original intent. This case demonstrates the principle that contracts should reflect actual party agreements, not just written terms.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · April 18, 2018

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.