Petitioner
Fil-Estate Properties
Respondent
Spouses Conrado
Citation
G.R. No. 185798
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Perez, J.
Decided
January 13, 2014

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the refund order for respondent spouses who purchased a condominium unit but did not receive the completed property due to construction stoppage. Petitioner developers claimed the 1997 Asian financial crisis excused their non-performance as a fortuitous event. The Court rejected this defense, citing precedent that the financial crisis was not unforeseeable for real estate enterprises engaged in pre-selling. Under P.D. 957 and Civil Code Article 1191, buyers are entitled to rescission and refund when developers fail to complete projects within the prescribed time. The Court modified the interest rate from 12% to 6% per BSP circular, while sustaining awards for moral damages, attorney's fees, and administrative fines for the developers' bad faith breach.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 13, 2014

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.