Petitioner
Philippine National Construction Corporation
Respondent
Apac Marketing Corporation
Citation
G.R. No. 190957
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Sereno, C.J.
Decided
June 5, 2013

Summary

This Supreme Court case involves a commercial dispute between PNCC and APAC Marketing over payment for crushed basalt rock materials. While PNCC eventually paid the principal obligation, the lower courts awarded attorney's fees to APAC. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that attorney's fees under Article 2208 of the Civil Code require specific factual, legal, and equitable justification. The Court emphasized that attorney's fees are exceptional, not routine awards, and courts must clearly articulate the legal basis. The RTC's finding that APAC was 'compelled to litigate' was insufficient under Article 2208's enumerated exceptions. This decision reinforces the restrictive approach to attorney's fees awards and the requirement for detailed judicial reasoning in granting such awards.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 5, 2013

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.