Petitioner
Philnico Industrial Corporation
Respondent
Privatization
Citation
G.R. No. 199420
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Leonardo-De Castro, J.
Decided
August 27, 2014

Summary

This case involved a contractual dispute over the sale of 22.5 million shares of Philnico Processing Corporation from PMO to PIC under installment terms. When PIC defaulted on payments, PMO sought to enforce an automatic reversion clause returning the shares without foreclosure proceedings. The Supreme Court definitively ruled that this ipso facto reversion clause constituted pactum commissorium - a prohibited automatic appropriation of pledged property. The Court held that despite being in separate documents, the sale agreement (ARDA) and pledge agreement must be read together, creating both elements of pactum commissorium: a pledge for security and automatic appropriation upon default. This violated Article 2088 of the Civil Code and was declared null and void. The decision affirmed the preliminary injunction preventing automatic reversion and established important precedent on contractual interpretation and the prohibition against pactum commissorium in complex commercial transactions involving government asset privatization.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 27, 2014

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.